Vol 1 Issue 3
Table of Contents | Gateway Home Page

Finite Element Analysis in the Freshman Year?

The multimedia Gateway Learning Laboratory at Columbia University was created to provide resources to encourage the exploration and development of innovative educational efforts in undergraduate education. All first-year students in engineering (~300) are provided with access to Silicon Graphics workstations and software to introduce them to engineering in a real-world context and help them gain insight into what engineers do and how they work on real projects. They are required to take an introductory engineering course in the Lab. Students are coached to explore the Internet and the World Wide Web and to create their own home pages. Instructors exploit multimedia techniques to provide an introduction to 3D engineering graphics, modeling and animation. A number of easily grasped interactive (Java-based) modules are assigned to explore the nature of the design process. The level of analysis required is minimal; the emphasis is on the iterative character of design and the general absence of a unique design solution.

Each year new topics and approaches are implemented in the Gateway Lab in order to improve the first-year course. In a novel instructional experiment, the subject of Finite Element Analysis As A Design Tool has been introduced into the first-year course. In industry, design engineers begin with computer-aided design software to develop a product and then must subject the design to analysis to determine, for example, if the product will break, be difficult to manufacture, or be deficient in a way that might affect the use of the product. The analysis part is generally done by the so-called finite element method and involves concepts that traditionally are provided only in upper-division course work.

Finite element analysis (FEA) is a powerful computational tool that provides approximate solutions to physical problems that cannot be solved analytically, i.e., most design problems. It entails dividing a physical object into a large set of discrete elements that approximate geometrically the object under study and then applying the appropriate physical laws to each of the linked individual elements. A very large number of relatively simple iterations are performed on the approximate system to arrive at an accurate approximation. The results are used to modify the design, and the analysis is repeated as often as necessary to obtain a desired design result.

FEA is the most widely used computational tool for numerical analysis in almost every industry. Modern computational FEA applications include not only powerful numerical techniques but also user-friendly, graphical techniques that simplify the process of constructing the elements and their equations. A decade ago, FEA was used only by experienced engineers in industry and taught to graduate students. In recent years, as the speed of computers has increased greatly and the associated FEA software has attained a high level of user friendliness, finite element methods� usage has migrated into the upper levels of the undergraduate curriculum in many institutions. Two industrial-strength commercial software packages that utilize finite element modules for design analysis�I-DEAS and Pro-Engineer�are provided by the Gateway Lab and used in upper-level design courses. They enable exceptional multi-dimensional visual displays of the input and output of loads, displacements, temperature fields, heat fluxes, stress-strain fields, fluid velocity fields, etc., depending upon the physical problem.

To introduce FEA into a first-year course is a challenging experience. To set up and perform the requisite operations normally requires a level of knowledge not possessed by first-year students. Student instructors have developed a combination of scripts, C code, and I-DEAS or Pro-Engineer modules to enable first-year students to vary physical model parameters and to generate finite element models automatically.

In the first computational experiments, an easily grasped physical problem was posed. A cantilevered, two-dimensional triangular shaped steel bracket of given dimensions with a hole near the center was subjected to a load distributed along one edge of the bracket [fig.1].

 

 

 

 

 

Figure 1: Here, an automatically generated model of the bracket is shown. Finite Element mesh on the front face. Boundary Conditions consist of a Restraining Set (vectors along the left edge) and the Load Set (arrows along the top edge). The Restraining Set signifies the attachment of the bracket to the wall, while the Load Set is the distributed force.

It was desired to find the size and location of the largest hole that would keep stresses below the allowed maximum while minimizing the weight of the bracket. The students were given some indication how the stress distribution varies as the hole is moved and resized. Prior to this, the students were introduced in an elementary fashion to such concepts as stress, strain, stress concentrations, safety factors and ultimate tensile strength [fig.2].

 

 

 

 

 

Figure 2: For structural FEA, results consist of stress and displacement distributions. Here, the displacement is exaggerated. Stress field is shown using color shading or line contours; stress concentrations occur where the density of the contours is high. Maximum and minimum stress values are also automatically calculated.

Along with these fundamentals, students were introduced to the iterative approach to design. They were instructed to experiment and use the trial and error approach; however, educated guessing was encouraged. In addition to screenshots of successful iterations, students had to submit a paragraph describing the assumptions and conclusions they made. Students were asked to seek out trends, as well as attempt to explain them.

Another application introduced in class was an adaptation of a design project assigned to students in a junior-level heat transfer course. Here, a set of cooling fins was to be designed in order to facilitate heat dissipation from a CPU chip. The students were to determine the optimal aspect ratio of the fins, defined as the height-to-width ratio. Following a brief discussion of the three mechanisms of heat transfer (convection, conduction, and radiation), they were asked to try and guess what the relationship between the aspect ratio and the maximum temperature would be. The dominating opinion was usually one suggested by intuition: an increase in aspect ratio would result in larger surface area, thus allowing for more rapid convection, decreasing the maximum temperature. However, after several minutes of class discussion, a true understanding of the problem at hand was reached. With an increase in the aspect ratio, the cross sectional area of the fins would decrease, slowing down heat conduction into the fins. Thus, a balance between conduction and convection had to be struck.

Despite some technical difficulties and software glitches, all student groups were able to arrive at a valid solution. Most write-ups showed good understanding of the design problem, as well as the fundamentals discussed in class. Since FEA packages such as I-DEAS and Pro-Engineer are equipped with powerful post-processing modules, students were able to see exactly the results of the changes they made. Instead of thinking about stress as force over area, they were able to understand the concept on a much more practical level. Some students were also noticing the similarities between heat transfer and fluid flow problems and their finite element treatment.

The main complaint students had was that the modules took a relatively long time to complete. Lack of continuity with the rest of the class material was also criticized. Most students, however, seemed very involved in the design modules; they were impressed with the capabilities of Finite Element Analysis. Several students even attempted (with varied success) to perform a series of back of the envelope

calculations to verify the validity of FEA results, as well as try and predict the outcome.

Among the benefits of introducing Finite Element Analysis to first-year engineering students is the fact that students were able to perform simple design tasks along the lines of "real world" problems. Techniques and methods of FEA were only touched upon; I-DEAS and Pro-Engineer were used merely as "proving grounds" for the students' ideas. The purpose of the FEA modules was similar to that of laboratory courses designed to provide undergraduates with hands-on experience leading to deeper understanding of fundamentals.

 

 

 

 

 

Should Finite Element Analysis modules become a permanent part of the syllabus, more effort would be required to introduce other practical design problems. Technical issues would have to be addressed in order to make the modules more user-friendly and less time consuming. The content of modules would also have to be tightly interfaced with the rest of the course material.

For more information, contact:

Mark Angelov
Columbia University
[email protected]

or

Morton Friedman
Vice Dean for Engineering
Columbia University
610 Seely W. Mudd Building
500 West 120th St.
New York, NY 10027
(212) 854-2986
[email protected]

Table of Contents | Gateway Home Page


Copyright © 1997 by the Gateway Coalition.
Questions or comments? Contact [email protected]
Last modified: April 28th, 1998.